[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Support for native OS threads ?

To: kramer@al.esec.ch
Subject: Re: Support for native OS threads ?
From: Mario.Wolczko@Eng.Sun.COM (Mario Wolczko)
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 1995 16:49:29 -0700
Cc: self-interest@otis.Stanford.EDU
In-reply-to: <CMM.0.90.2.798838041.bay@jah> (message from Reto Kramer on Tue, 25 Apr 95 13:19:37 METDST)
Resent-date: Wed, 26 Apr 1995 16:49:29 -0700
Resent-from: Bay.Chang@Eng.Sun.COM (Bay-Wei Chang [CONTRACTOR])
Resent-message-id: <9504282239.AA07714@traits.Eng.Sun.COM>
Resent-to: real-self-interest@self.stanford.edu

   From: Reto Kramer <kramer@al.esec.ch>
   Date: Tue, 25 Apr 95 13:19:37 METDST

   Does the current self system support 
   native OS threads ?

No, sorry.

   (At the moment I am working with ParcPlace
    Smalltalk and I have about 250 Processes
    around. It would be nice, if they were
    on the level of the OS as opposed to the
    VM and bytecodes, as they are at the moment)

Presumably you have a multiprocessor that could exploit the
concurrency.  

It would be nice to put this into the Self VM, but it's not easy and I
can't imagine it happening anytime soon.

-Mario

References:
- Support for native OS threads ?
  - From: Reto Kramer <kramer@al.esec.ch>

Prev by Date: Support for native OS threads ?
Next by Date: Re:Re: Support for native OS threads ?
Previous by thread: Support for native OS threads ?
Next by thread: Re:Re: Support for native OS threads ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread